Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 Assessment | Trusted Evaluations

The Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 gaming monitor is full of options, has an immersive type issue, and it’s a succesful choice for mainstream avid gamers – particularly should you’re tied into the Corsair and Elgato techniques. However its picture high quality is mediocre, and it’s pricier than a few of its higher rivals

Introduction

The Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 is the primary monitor from the gaming large, and it’s a pure evolution for the corporate that made its title with circumstances, keyboards, mice and coolers.

The Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 goals for the mainstream with a QHD decision, 165Hz syncing and a desk-dominating 32-inch diagonal.

Corsair pairs the mainstream specification with UK, US and European pricing of £699 / $799 / €799, although, which signifies that the Xeneon is pricier than some rivals and comparable with others.

It’s an formidable worth level for a first-time monitor producer, so the 32QHD165 must work arduous to prise open avid gamers’ wallets.

Design and options

• A 32-inch show with a stable mainstream decision
• 165Hz and first rate response occasions imply video games are quick and easy
• Works properly with Corsair’s current peripherals

The 32-inch diagonal is an efficient place to start out on a gaming show – the Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 has an immersive type issue, and definitely extra absorbing than the 27in shows that sit a step down within the monitor hierarchy.

The 2560 x 1440 decision is an efficient match for the 32-inch show. It’s excessive sufficient to supply crisp gaming, however low sufficient to allow a great deal of totally different graphics playing cards to deal with this panel. When you’ve got an Nvidia RTX 3070 or AMD RX 6700 XT you’ll have the ability to run nearly something, and eSports video games will play easily should you’ve received mainstream GPUs just like the RTX 3060.

There are downsides to this decision and dimension. Whereas the 1440p determine is ok for mainstream gaming, the density degree of 92ppi is just not notably excessive. You possibly can see the panel’s pixels while you’re near the display, and also you’ll get a crisper expertise with 4K shows and on widescreens with the next decision. Conversely, you’ll want a greater graphics card to drive these panels.

Corsair’s panel makes use of IPS know-how, which is unsurprising in a mainstream gaming show, and it runs at a peak refresh fee of 165Hz. It additionally has AMD FreeSync Premium, and it’s suitable with Nvidia graphics playing cards too. That’s an inexpensive refresh fee – effective for single-player titles and acceptable for mainstream eSports.

The remainder of the specification is nice for mainstream video games. The Corsair has a 1ms MPRT response time and a sub-3ms GTG response determine, and each of these are good for mainstream video games – solely the quickest aggressive displays hit 1ms in each measurements.

The 165Hz synchronised refresh fee makes single-player video games and multiplayer titles look easy and quick, and movement is sharp. It’s actually not good: you may nonetheless see blurring should you look intently at fast conditions, and the trio of Overdrive settings solely make issues marginally sharper, however you’ll not discover the problems in on a regular basis use. And, anyway, the one method to actually clear up these downside is to purchase a 240Hz or 360Hz show with a 1ms GTG response time.

The Corsair makes use of Quantum Dot LEDs, which emit pure blue, crimson and inexperienced mild to create bolder, stronger colors. Corsair claims that the Xeneon renders 100% of the sRGB and Adobe RGB gamuts in consequence.

In some areas, the Corsair is just bizarre. This monitor has 8-bit color reasonably than 10-bit, so it renders 16.7 million shades reasonably than a couple of billion. That’s not a priority for gaming, but it surely’s not supreme if you would like a show for colour-sensitive workloads too. And don’t purchase the Corsair if you would like a panel for HDR video games and media – it solely adheres to the entry-level DisplayHDR 400 gamut and its peak brightness isn’t a lot increased than 400 nits, so that you received’t get any vital achieve.

Corsair’s show sits on prime of a bold-looking stand. It makes use of die-cast aluminium, and it combines a central strut with slim, angular loops. Elsewhere, the Xeneon has a slim display bezel for multi-monitor use, and on the rear there are customisable cable-tidying loops. It’s doable to connect an Elgato Flex Arm or digicam mount to the stand – useful for streaming and video calls.

Elsewhere, the Xeneon integrates with Corsair iCUE, which suggests you may customise the show’s settings from inside Home windows. It integrates with the Elgato Stream Deck for an added layer of versatility, and settings could be altered on the Corsair iCUE Nexus keyboard accent. For those who’d reasonably not use these strategies, there’s a effective joystick on the rear of the display. The on-screen show appears to be like primary, but it surely’s received all of the mainstream choices you’ll want.

Corsair’s panel has two full-size USB ports and two USB-C connectors, and a kind of helps DisplayPort and 15W of energy supply. The Xeneon additionally has two HDMI 2.0 ports and one DisplayPort 1.4 socket. That’s good connectivity, though putting in the ports on the rear is all the time an irritation.

The Xeneon has a reasonable 110mm of peak adjustment alongside 100mm VESA mount compatibility, and it has 60 levels of swivel motion and 25 levels of tilt. That’s fully effective for this class of show. Construct high quality is just mediocre, although – the rear plastic strikes far an excessive amount of.

One of many Corsair’s important rivals is the Samsung Odyssey G7, which prices £619 / $799 / €629 should you purchase its 32-inch model. That show is curved, shares the Corsair’s decision, and it has a 240Hz refresh fee and a 10-bit VA panel with a 1ms GTG response time.

The MSI MPG Artymis 343CQR is a curved widescreen with a 3440 x 1440 decision, 165Hz refresh fee and an underlying VA display, and it’ll value you £899 / $799 / €797. After which there’s the Dell S3220DGF: it matches the Corsair’s dimension, decision and refresh fee for a worth of simply £399 / $479 / €368, and it’s curved. But it surely does have a poorer response time and fewer options than the Corsair.

Picture high quality

• Mediocre colors till you utilize sure display modes
• Stable color gamut efficiency undermined elsewhere
• Underwhelming distinction when in comparison with VA-based rivals

My preliminary assessments on the Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165 weren’t spectacular. The brightness degree of 137 nits was dim, and the black level of 0.18 nits is ok – however these figures created a distinction ratio of 761:1.

That’s low, even for an IPS show, which suggests you don’t get a lot depth or nuance from this panel. Rising the brightness degree made the panel punchier, however a corresponding improve within the black level meant the distinction ratio didn’t enhance.

The Corsair Xeneon 32QHD165’s preliminary Delta E of 4.37 is mediocre, and the color temperature of 6,093K is ok, however not excellent – it’s slightly on the nice and cozy facet.

The Xeneon rendered 98.5% off the sRGB color gamut at a monster 169% quantity, and it dealt with 98.6% of the Adobe RGB house with a quantity of 116.4%. These are nice outcomes, they usually imply that the panel will ship any shade wanted by mainstream video games.

These conflicting outcomes result in an underwhelming color state of affairs. The Corsair renders each shade you’ll want and it’s adequate for mainstream video games, however the poor distinction and Delta E figures imply this panel lacks vibrancy, refinement and accuracy.

Switching to the Corsair’s Sport mode didn’t have a lot of an affect – it ramped up the brightness, however the distinction, Delta E and color temperature settings remained the identical. You don’t get genre-specific mode choices on this show, both. The Film mode additionally had no affect on high quality.

Your best option by far is the sRGB mode. With this setting chosen the Corsair’s distinction improved barely, to 817:1, and the color temperature of 6150K was marginally nearer to the 6500K supreme. The show’s Delta E improved to an excellent 1.21. That is one of the simplest ways to get good high quality from this panel and the one state of affairs the place the Corsair’s Delta E improved on rivals.

The Corsair’s backlight misplaced 13% of its energy on the left-hand edge however practically 20% alongside the right-hand facet, which is one other middling outcome. It’s not dangerous sufficient to have an effect on gameplay, however higher figures right here would produce a extra constant image.

Regardless of its poor distinction, the Corsair is nice sufficient to make use of for mainstream and informal gaming, however its rivals are constantly higher. The cheaper Dell used a VA panel to serve up mighty distinction figures alongside rock-solid Delta E and color temperature outcomes. The widescreen MSI delivered higher distinction and HDR efficiency, and that show had first rate sRGB colors too. The curved Samsung additionally delivered higher distinction and good sRGB colors.

In the end, the Corsair affords disappointing high quality. IPS panels by no means match VA screens for distinction, however the Xeneon has poor distinction even when in comparison with different IPS screens. And whereas IPS normally fights again with higher color accuracy, the Corsair is middling in that regard too – it would deal with its gamuts with lashings of quantity, however these colors are usually not daring or correct.

Mainstream video games will look effective on this panel and the Xeneon has good options, particularly should you already subscribe to the Corsair ecosystem – however its opponents all provide higher picture high quality.

Newest offers